It is interesting that local emerging brands are almost optimistic about the laser pointer, and they don’t care about HLD. Most of the established manufacturers are two-way choices, which focus on laser products and also make efforts in the field of HLD. The author believes that the formation of this industry pattern is also inevitable. First of all, local emerging brands. Frustrated by financial strength and performance pressure, it is difficult for them to play the development model of “full product line”. They can only choose side teams between laser and HLD.
Obviously, from a technical point of view, laser has more advantages, and at the same time, the hype is more sufficient, so everyone stands under the banner of laser without hesitation. Emerging brands are more interested in laser light source products. The incumbent manufacturers have abundant funds and sufficient market accumulation, so they have sufficient capital to follow the multi-line development model. Instead of putting eggs in the same basket and using different products to meet different industry segments, the author believes that this choice is the most sensible for established manufacturers.
In this way, an interesting situation has formed. Although all big brand manufacturers are shouting for HLD, they are actually not so respectful of HLD because they follow the development model of the entire product line of laser pointers. HLD is just one of them. One. In order to establish a brand image and seize the market as soon as possible, emerging brands often spare no effort to popularize the advantages and characteristics of lasers. This is why lasers are significantly more powerful than HLDs as new light sources.