In the new round of evolution, the challenges facing electronic countermeasures are not optimistic. Electronic defense technology is constantly being upgraded. In the field of electromagnetic struggle, new frequency-using technologies or equipment are always used to enhance anti-reconnaissance and anti-jamming capabilities, and then electronic countermeasures against them may emerge. This objective law determines the natural lag of the laser pointer‘s electronic counterparty relative to the user of the spectrum.
Driven by the emerging electronic information technology, the technical system of communication, radar, navigation and other frequency-using equipment has been continuously upgraded, and the existing electronic reconnaissance and attack methods have been shaken away from several “positions.” “Low-to-zero power” equipment, noise-like signal modulation and other advanced technologies have made electronic countermeasures into a dilemma of “reconnoiter” and “interference is invalid”, leading to the obsolescence of a number of traditional interference equipment.
Technical performance determines tactical capabilities, affects combat effectiveness, and affects the outcome of the war. The technological gap brought by advanced electromagnetic application technology directly limits the effectiveness of electronic countermeasures and has a fundamental impact on seizing control of battlefield electromagnetic power. If the technological catch-up cannot be achieved as soon as possible, the gap between offense and defense will be further widened, and the idea of reducing the informatization combat capability of powerful enemies with electronic laser pointers attacks will be difficult to achieve. Lack of electromagnetic situation shaping capabilities.